Osian's - Indian Art News https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com News on Modern and Contemporary Indian Art presented by Visions Art Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:57:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://i0.wp.com/indianartnews.visionsarts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cropped-Visions-Art.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 Osian's - Indian Art News https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com 32 32 136536861 Osian’s Neville Tuli | A Fading canvas by Archna Shukla https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-neville-tuli-a-fading-canvas-by-archna-shukla/ https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-neville-tuli-a-fading-canvas-by-archna-shukla/#respond Thu, 21 Jul 2011 07:57:00 +0000 http://indianartnews.info/osians-neville-tuli-a-fading-canvas-by-archna-shukla/ Source: Indian Express The early 2000s were a fascinating period. The economy was galloping at a rate of 7-8 per cent, stock markets were attracting global investors, real estate …

The post Osian’s Neville Tuli | A Fading canvas by Archna Shukla first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
Source: Indian Express
The early 2000s were a fascinating period. The economy was galloping at a rate of 7-8 per cent, stock markets were attracting global investors, real estate was booming and disposable incomes were rising. Hawkers of all hues—from those selling soaps to fizzy drinks, exotic cheese to wines, insurance policies to reckless money-making ideas—were busy exploiting opportunities in this exciting environment.
In the middle of this euphoria was brewing an interesting experiment of transforming art, hitherto considered a preserve of the super rich, into an accessible and consumable product for the emerging rich. Neville Tuli was the man behind this movement. A young Punjabi who had moved back into the country after studying at Oxford and the London School of Economics, Tuli was a trained economist with no background in arts. But he believed India’s art and cultural history presented a unique opportunity to build a distinctive growth and development model around it. Materialism through creativity was the motto with which he stormed into the Indian art scene around the mid nineties. Between 1995 and 2000, he curated grand exhibitions, launched a charity platform, HEART, to promote art and its education, published a much celebrated book, The Flamed Mosaic, on Indian contemporary art. In November 1997, he held the country’s first independent auction without any assistance from international auction houses such as Sotheby’s and Christie’s in which Raja Ravi Varma’s The Begum’s Bath was sold for Rs 32 lakh, the maximum an Indian contemporary work had fetched in any auction till then.
By early 2000, Tuli had emerged as the brightest star on the Indian art firmament. In 2000, he launched the Osian’s Connoisseurs of Art Pvt Ltd (OCA), a unique corporate body that housed India’s first indigenous auction house, an archiving, research and documentation centre, a wealth management service, and a film house. OCA soon acquired a film festival, an art journal, picked up sponsorship of a team in Durand Cup Football and in 2006, it launched Osian’s Art Fund, India’s largest art fund thus far. Osian’s corporate journey riding art panned out beautifully over the next few years. In the financial year that ended March 2003, Osian’s total revenue was Rs 20 crore and profits Rs 2 crore. In 2005, the revenues had soared to Rs 100 crore and profits to Rs 10 crore. In 2006, a US-based hedge fund, Venus Capital Management, picked up a 5 per cent stake in Osian’s for around Rs 11 crore, valuing it at around Rs 225 crore. Two years later, a Dubai-based private equity company, Abraaj Capital, picked up 9.4 per cent stake in the company for Rs 80 crore, shooting its valuation to more than Rs 800 crore.
Alongside the riches, Tuli had also built goodwill among India’s art aficionados. Investors in his company, for instance, included industrialists Kumar Mangalam Birla, Gautam Thapar, Shiv Nadar, banker Pramit Jhaveri, well known entrepreneurs Jaithirth Rao and Sanjeev Khandelwal, among others. Equally high-profile individuals, such as former culture secretary Muthusamy Varadarajan, investment banker Pulak Prasad, economist Dr Meghnad Desai and Melinda and Bill Gates Foundation’s director Ashok Alexander adorned OCA’s board.
In the past two years, however, Tuli’s world has turned upside down. His publishing business has shut down, the film festival is in a state of limbo, the football sponsorship is gone, the art fund is in the tank, and OCA itself is in a financial mess. A majority of his original board members have left the company (most of them refused to speak on the issue while a few spoke on condition of anonymity). In 2009-10, Osian’s income was a mere Rs 44 crore and it had piled up losses of Rs 101 crore. According to the provisional figures provided by Tuli, in the year ended March 2011, his income was Rs 52 crore and losses Rs 35 crore.
The failure of the art fund massively dented Tuli’s equity in the market. A closed-ended fund with a lock-in of three years, the much publicised fund had raised a little more than Rs 102 crore from high net worth individuals. Tuli, from various public platforms, said he expected the fund to generate 30-35 per cent returns. “Of course, there were no written guarantees but we were assured the fund will give returns higher than regular asset classes,” says a Delhi-based investor Sharat Jain.
Between 2006 and 2009, India’s flagship stock index Sensex clocked more than 60 per cent in returns, real estate on average locations rose 40-60 per cent in value, while gold went up more than 85 per cent. Two years after the fund matured in 2009, Jain has received only 85 per cent of the Rs 10 lakh principal he had invested in the fund.
Looking back, it seems Tuli tried to achieve too much too fast in a space too small. Within five years of setting foot into the corporate world, he had spread himself thin across many diverse segments, many of which were almost non-existent then. The auction house, itself the first of its kind in India, was the primary revenue generator and was used to foster all the new initiatives. Besides, Tuli was building an inventory at a rate and prices that shocked everyone. A Bloomberg report dated May 24, 2006, cites a scene at a Sotheby’s auction held the previous day: “Neville Tuli, founder of the auction house Osian’s in Mumbai, bought at least four contemporary works in an hour from his front-row seat yesterday, nodding continually until his rivals dropped out.” The report says Tuli paid 310,400 pounds for an untitled Francis Newton Souza painting, bidding it up from a top estimate of 150,000 pounds, and 48,000 pounds, almost seven times its top estimate, for a work by a Sri Lankan artist.
It isn’t just paintings Tuli was betting his money on. A Times of India report published on April 4, 2006, says Osian’s spent close to $5 million to “bring back priceless Buddhist thangkas and buy iconic posters of Marilyn Monroe, Alfred Hitchcock and Walt Disney”. Tuli says he was collecting the art work for the proposed Osianama project, which he describes as India’s first integrated museum complex for film, arts and the environment. His detractors say he was simply indulging himself and also, in the process creating a false euphoria in the market.
In November 2009, Tuli told a publication that Osian’s owned 265,000 pieces of original art work and memorabilia valued at around Rs 800-1,000 crore. Its current value at cost is around Rs 400-500 crore and Tuli admits in liquidity terms it could be even less.
Wrong Stroke
According to various estimates, between 1995 and 2005, arts sales in India had grown from Rs 50 crore to around Rs 800 crore. Indian artists such as M F Husain, Tyeb Mehta, V S Gaitonde, and Souza were selling for several crores of rupees and market pundits were forecasting a massive rally in the coming years. In 2011, the market has grown to a mere Rs 1,200-1,500 crore. “Though there is a lot of potential for art markets to grow keeping in mind the huge wealth creation happening in India, art even today is a fringe segment when compared to other asset classes such as equity, real estate or gold,” says Amit Sarup, president, Religare Art Initiative. Liquidity is the biggest challenge in the art market, observers point out.
Tuli was taking giant steps on this shaky ground. His art fund is a case in point. Between 2005 and 2008, some half-a-dozen art funds were launched but most raised around Rs 20-25 crore with the exception of one that raised Rs 40 crore. In contrast, Osian’s had collected more than Rs 102 crore. “Put together, all these funds raised around Rs 250 crore in a market of around Rs 800 crore. They gave investors hopes of giving around 25-30 per cent returns over three-four years, which meant at the time of maturity, the art funds would have been the biggest sellers in the market. The market wasn’t mature enough to handle big sales at one go. Besides, anybody should have guessed that bulk sales would beat prices down,” says Rishiraj Sethi, director, Aura Art Development Pvt Ltd, a Mumbai-based art house.
The financial meltdown in 2008 worsened this already precarious situation—liquidity dried, investors disappeared from the market, prices plummeted and the virtuous cycle art had entered was ruptured. Most funds could not honour their commitments. But Tuli, thanks to his high profile undertakings, attracted sharpest scrutiny.
Tuli entirely blames the economic crisis for his debacle. He says the art fund couldn’t pay back investors on time because of the “total meltdown in the liquidity of the art market, the massive fall of prices (in excess of 50 per cent) and fall in volumes and confidence across the world and India. This triggered many investors failing to honour their commitments made in 2008.”
Observers, however, say there is more to Tuli’s woes. Besides reckless buying and hoarding of art work and expansion at a furious pace, his peers say that Osian’s business structure was flawed with each segment being intricately involved with the other. It is alleged that his fund bought and sold art work from Osian’s own auction house and his other associates, while he himself played a lead role across all his ventures.
Tuli refuses to be defensive on the issue calling it a case of “false conflict”. “All pioneering activities have to have conflicts of interest otherwise they would never take off, because you need the merger of certain expertise to happen so that a certain threshold of infrastructure is built to share that new market with the public,” he says.
Osian’s pricing strategy and even the calculation of the net asset value of the units of the art fund have drawn criticism. The net asset value was calculated based on an Art Index that Osian’s launched with business daily The Economic Times (ET) in 2006. The index followed the art prices of 51 top contemporary artists whose art work comprised 81 per cent of the then organised market. Critics say it wasn’t a fool-proof methodology but to be fair to Osian’s, there was no other benchmark available, nor were there any regulatory indicators to plug seeming loopholes, a situation that still exists. Osian’s, however, may have violated an ethical boundary in the arrangement. ET’s parent Bennett Coleman & Co Ltd (BCCL) is a stakeholder, albeit small (1.6 per cent), in Osian’s. Besides, BCCL is also one of the largest art collectors in the country and has been actively buying and selling art work for several years. Tuli’s detractors see a serious conflict of interest in this arrangement. Tuli doesn’t agree. “Their (BCCL’s) role was just a platform for awareness building, no interference at all in data collection and analysis,” he says.
Never say die
The allegations and their denials aside, Tuli admits to having made mistakes. “In retrospect, I included too many diverse non-profit making activities placing immense burden on the auction house. When the market melted, Osian’s having a huge debt, suffered the most,” he says.
He is bitter but retains his spunk and is eager to begin afresh. “Osian’s last auction was in June 2010 when I took the decision to start the reconsolidation of all the divisions of Osian’s, stop all activities apart from the research and digitisation of the knowledge base and only when all outstanding financial obligations are fulfilled will we start the auctions with a new specialised yet integrated institutional structure.” He hopes to restart his auction operations by December 2011 and to repay art fund investors by the end of this month.
“We will be making profits by 2012 once the restructuring of activities and debt is complete,” he asserts.

The post Osian’s Neville Tuli | A Fading canvas by Archna Shukla first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-neville-tuli-a-fading-canvas-by-archna-shukla/feed/ 0 421
Premier art houses under I-T scanner https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/premier-art-houses-under-i-t-scanner/ https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/premier-art-houses-under-i-t-scanner/#respond Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:36:00 +0000 http://indianartnews.info/premier-art-houses-under-i-t-scanner/ Art houses can use these fictitious purchase bills to set an inflated benchmark price for works by artists, causing genuine investors to pay more Khushboo Narayan – THE MINT …

The post Premier art houses under I-T scanner first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
Art houses can use these fictitious purchase bills to set an inflated benchmark price for works by artists, causing genuine investors to pay more

Khushboo Narayan – THE MINT

Mumbai: An investigation into the business practices of Osian’s and Saffronart Management Corp., two of India’s premier art houses, has revealed several irregularities in their account books, including a possible attempt to rig the price of artworks and dupe investors, according to an income-tax (I-T) department official involved in the probe.The two houses—both set up in 2000—separately denied any wrongdoing, claiming all their transactions were transparent, well documented and in line with the law.Busted? Osian’s chairman Neville Tuli with a statue of Sean Connery. Tuli has denied allegations of any wrongdoing at the art house. Natasha Hemrajani / HTThe I-T department’s “appraisal report”, previewed by Mint, reveals that Osian’s had obtained fake purchase bills worth Rs15 crore for artworks. The department, which started a probe into alleged tax evasion in 2007, questioned three persons who provided Osian’s with such bills and admitted they were fake, the official said.“Fake purchase bills can be used to inflate the price of art by lesser known artists. This is the easiest form of manipulation of prices in the art world. The technique is similar to that used in the stock market to rig the share prices of any company,” said the official, who didn’t want to be named. Art houses can use these fictitious purchase bills to set an inflated benchmark price for works by artists, causing genuine investors to pay more, according to the official. “Some of the art galleries have inflated the price of certain artists up to as much as 700%,” the official said. The assessment wing of the I-T department in Mumbai is evaluating the extent of suspected tax evasion by the two houses.On Saffronart, the report said the art house had paid royalty to an associate firm, Planet Saffronart Management Corp., in the British Virgin Islands, to reduce its tax liability. The report also said Planet Saffronart had given Rs11 crore to Saffronart for acquiring its intellectual property rights. Also See Under Suspicion The department investigated such transactions and found them not in line with the law, said the official. “We have also found a lot of cash transactions in Saffronart,” he said.The report also said at least 18 investors, who had invested Rs10 lakh and above each in Osian’s Art Fund, could not explain the source of the money they had put in the fund.An art fund is like a mutual fund where investors do not pick the individual investment vehicles and instead invest in a pool of artworks. Typically, high net worth individuals invest in such funds. The minimum investment in some funds is pegged at Rs25 lakh.The I-T department has alleged that Osian’s was involved in synchronized trading and rigging of prices of art.
In an emailed response to Mint queries, Neville Tuli, Osian’s chairman, said: “The allegations are false and defamatory. The so-called Rs15 crore fake purchases are absolutely incorrect. These transactions were made to Gallery 7, a 20-year-old gallery, and (an) associate art dealer called Rashesh Shah, for purchase of artworks by artists such as J. Swaminathan, S.H. Raza, Ramkumar, A. Padamsee, V.S. Gaitonde, Jogen Chowdhury, Atul Dodiya, among others.“Like with many galleries and dealers, they told us that they would like to directly invoice Osian’s from their client’s company, as they do not own the artwork. We were told that the client will pay them their commission. All transactions were fully paid in cheque and all artworks physically handed over to Osian’s.”According to Tuli, the I-T department two years later told Osian’s that these clients of Gallery 7 and Shah were not genuine art collectors but benami parties. “We have never dealt with Gallery 7 and Shah thereafter.” A benami transaction includes any deal in which an asset is transferred to one person for a consideration paid or provided by another person.“Gallery 7 has no correlation with any claims made by Osian’s. We clearly state that there has been no involvement of Gallery 7 in any kind of transaction with Osian’s in the past few years. The claims are totally absurd and preposterous,” said Nicholas Sachdev, partner, Gallery 7.Sachdev said Shah was an independent art dealer and not a part of Gallery 7. “Being an art gallery we refer a lot of clients to auction houses but we have not done transactions on behalf of any client or received commissions,” Sachdev said.Mint could not ascertain the whereabouts of Shah.Tuli also said, “There is no question at all of Osian’s creating bogus turnover or synchronized trading to rig up prices. It is totally against our ethos and the very reason why we exist. Naturally, there are many people who bought art for investment and hence reselling is part of the process. That is absolutely normal.”On investments in the Osian’s Art Fund, Tuli said, “Every investor filled up a detailed form with PAN (permanent account number) and bank account details, bank references and all legal requirements. Every document was given to the authorities; every payment was in full cheque. Your claim is absolutely not true.”According to him, the success of the Osian’s Art Fund had upset many. “Many fear that art funds will soon become public platforms, and so help further destroy the black economy. At the same time, the levels of disclosure set by the Osian’s Art Fund make us easy targets,” he said.In an emailed response to Mint’s queries, a Saffronart spokesperson said, “Saffronart has been pivotal in introducing complete transparency in the market for Indian contemporary art by publishing transaction details and prices clearly on our website. We are a professional company and all our transactions are clearly documented and are in compliance with applicable laws.”According to Ranjit Hoskote, a Mumbai-based art critic, there is no such thing as an authentic price for a work of art. “There is only a current price widely agreed upon by all market actors and proportional to the available capital and purchasing power within a specific context—and you can take it or leave it. That is the nature of any market,” Hoskote said.
“The question of a conflict of interest can hardly arise, because the interests of artists, auction houses and galleries are closely aligned. And do remember that no collector or investor has ever been coerced into buying a work of art—you always have the option of not buying in a private sale, of not bidding in an auction. If people have been prepared to buy works of art at prices that are obviously steeper than they should have been, this is a comment on their own desire to profit from a boom-time scenario…to participate in the creation of a new market,” he said in an email.In a nascent art market such as India, according to him, systems of mutual regulation and transparent valuation are yet to be codified but are bound to come within the next decade. Art galleries and experts believe the market is slowing due to the downturn. “The galleries are bemoaning the fewer footfalls, and young investors who used to buy with their bonuses are no longer buying as easily,” said Saryu Doshi, former director of the National Gallery of Modern Art, Mumbai.Maitreyee Handique contributed to this story.

The post Premier art houses under I-T scanner first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/premier-art-houses-under-i-t-scanner/feed/ 0 525
Osian’s auction nets Rs 3.38 crores https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-auction-nets-rs-3-38-crores/ https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-auction-nets-rs-3-38-crores/#respond Wed, 25 Feb 2009 03:37:00 +0000 http://indianartnews.info/osians-auction-nets-rs-3-38-crores/ Source: samaylive.com New Delhi, Feb 24 : Noted auctioneer Osian’s has clocked Rs 3.38 crore in sales at its second auction this year with contemporary artist Atul Dodiya’s work …

The post Osian’s auction nets Rs 3.38 crores first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
Source: samaylive.com

New Delhi, Feb 24 : Noted auctioneer Osian’s has clocked Rs 3.38 crore in sales at its second auction this year with contemporary artist Atul Dodiya’s work dedicated to former Team India captain Rahul Dravid fetching the highest bid of Rs 57.6 lakhs.

A total of 25 out of 50 selected lots that went under the hammer were sold with a registered average lot price at Rs 13.5 lakhs at the auction held here on February 21. Osian’s first auction was the ABC series last month in Jaipur.

While Dodiya’s “Wall” fetched over Rs 57 lakhs, modern masters such as F N Souza, V S Gaitonde and Bikash Bhattacharjee also figured among the top five sellers in results released by the auction house Another highlight of the auction was K K Hebbar’s portrait of Indira Gandhi fetching Rs 19.2 lakh.

“Figure,” a brass sculpture by Meera Mukherjee fetched Rs 34.8 lakhs, while works by leading artists Chittaprosad, Manu Parekh, Sajal Roy, Amalnath Chakladar were also sold.

Both Mukherjee and Himmat Shah’s “Untitled” works were auctioned at prices above lower estimates, which the auction house said proved that “art of the highest historical significance holds its value far better than most other financial assets. ” Nevile Tuli, Founder-Chairman, said, “The art market is suffering like all other assets. This is thus the time to build when everyone has gone into hibernation.”

The post Osian’s auction nets Rs 3.38 crores first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/osians-auction-nets-rs-3-38-crores/feed/ 0 529
Books can reap money by Riddhi Doshi and Shanaya Lalkaka https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/books-can-reap-money-by-riddhi-doshi-and-shanaya-lalkaka/ https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/books-can-reap-money-by-riddhi-doshi-and-shanaya-lalkaka/#respond Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:47:00 +0000 http://indianartnews.info/books-can-reap-money-by-riddhi-doshi-and-shanaya-lalkaka/ International auction houses right from Sotheby’s and Christie’s to Indian auction houses like Osian’s, are scurrying to organise auctions that offer rare books. At the upcoming Osian’s auction many …

The post Books can reap money by Riddhi Doshi and Shanaya Lalkaka first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
International auction houses right from Sotheby’s and Christie’s to Indian auction houses like Osian’s, are scurrying to organise auctions that offer rare books.

At the upcoming Osian’s auction many rare Indian works on modern masters such as Raja Ravi Varma, Ravindranath, Amrita Sher-Gil, Ismat Chughtai, George Keyt, MF Husain and FN Souza among others will go under the hammer on July 15 at New Delhi. The entire collection which will include art works and film posters along with these rare books are worth Rs 24 crore.

Investing in books is a trend that is fast attracting people in the country. Brij Sharma, Head of antiquarian books and prints, Osian’s says, “Books can be a good investment today. In the Indian context it has always been true of illustrated books published in the last 200 years.” Sharma is of the opinion that the conventional sources of acquiring these books like booksellers who have very old collections, are just a handful across India. And with personal libraries drying up, there is every likelihood of their value will rise at a fast pace given the ever-increasing number of collectors. Sharma sites two examples; “I have seen Daniells’ Views of Calcutta, a set that has appreciated 12 times in ten years between two London auction houses and Osian’s itself has seen books on, Sher-Gil and Tagore appreciate by three to four times in five years or so.”

“There are many book collectors in India. I recently bought a three hundred years old, pocket book of Christian prayers from Germany. I bought it because I am interested in collecting rare books,” says Kalpana Shah, owner of Tao Art gallery. She adds, “The interest then leads to investment but the collectors of books are primarily passionate about collecting rare stuff and money follows naturally.”

Pervez Damania says, “In the west, there is a huge demand for collecting first edition books. I would like to lay my hands on rare Indian books. If I get to but the first copy of Rudyard Kipling’s Jungle Book I would be thrilled.”

But the million dollar question is that what kind of books are worth having in the collection. Maithili Parekh from Sothbey’s says, “First editions of popular books, handwritten essays, limited editions are just some.”

Sharma from Osian’s adds, “There are two streams of books favoured by Indian collectors: on Indian art and on British India. Many of the books were published in limited editions; most of them heavily illustrated with tipped-in colour plates on account of technological limitations which today add to their value.”

The post Books can reap money by Riddhi Doshi and Shanaya Lalkaka first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/books-can-reap-money-by-riddhi-doshi-and-shanaya-lalkaka/feed/ 0 677
Tagore, Husain, Raza to go under hammer at Osian’s ABC auction https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/tagore-husain-raza-to-go-under-hammer-at-osians-abc-auction/ https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/tagore-husain-raza-to-go-under-hammer-at-osians-abc-auction/#respond Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:28:00 +0000 http://indianartnews.info/tagore-husain-raza-to-go-under-hammer-at-osians-abc-auction/ 7 Jul, 2008Ashoke Nag, ET Bureau KOLKATA: Leading auctioneer Osian’s is coming up with the fifth edition of its ABC (Art, Books and Cinema) series sale soon. The auction …

The post Tagore, Husain, Raza to go under hammer at Osian’s ABC auction first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
7 Jul, 2008
Ashoke Nag, ET Bureau

KOLKATA: Leading auctioneer Osian’s is coming up with the fifth edition of its ABC (Art, Books and Cinema) series sale soon. The auction sports a total estimated value of Rs 24-25 crore, comprising 201 lots. Of these, 132 are paintings, 20 are books, while the rest embraces movie memorabilia.

The 132 lots of paintings encompass 25 contemporary works and the rest are modernist, post-war modernist and Bengal School. A Ram Kumar figurative from 1967 is estimated at Rs 2-2.5 crore, while a 1980 Raza Bindu is pegged in the band of Rs 1.6-2 crore. In the same breath, an MF Husain untitled is hovering in the range of Rs 80 lakh to Rs 1 crore and Krishen Khanna’s ‘The Rider’ will go under the hammer in the range of Rs 36-45 lakh.

The contemporaries find Atul Dodiya’s ‘Random Verse’ priced at Rs 72-90 lakh and a Surendran Nair watercolour, Darwaaza Kholo, which is estimated at Rs 16-20 lakh. The Bengal School section is being led by the three Tagores, Rabindranath, Abanindranath and Gaganendranath. The Tagorean pieces are estimated between Rs 16 lakh and Rs 20 lakh.

In step, a large drawing by Nandalal Bose from the Ajanta series dated 1909-10 is valued at Rs 10-12 lakh and a set of 20 pencil and ink drawings by Jamini Roy are placed at Rs 12-15 lakh. The auction is also offering a Gaitonde drawing in the bracket of Rs 10 lakh. In the list are also a Bikash Bhattacharjee at Rs 48-60 lakh and Jogen Chowdhury’s ‘Two Women’ from 1994 going for Rs 40-50 lakh.

“We are also bringing some works by Palsikar, an influential teacher of the 1950s, who taught artists like Bendre, Kulkarni and Kolte. The Palsikar works are ranging anywhere near Rs 6-7 lakh mark. In tandem, the auction is placing under the hammer a set of 47 rare drawings by Serbjeet Singh on the Kashmir War, titled ‘Jojila’. Singh did these works at the site of the war in 1948. The drawings are priced at Rs 24-30 lakh,” Osian’s chairman Neville Tuli told ET.

Mr Tuli added: “The momentum is returning now on a much deeper level. This is also being spurred by financial institutions and museums which are renewing their collecting habits for Indian, Asian and Arab art. There is a major infrastructural change which is happening across the world as art is now being recognised as a credible capital asset for all medium and long-term portfolio. This auction will take forward the development of Indian film memorabilia market and show the continuous strength of the domestic art scene.”

The post Tagore, Husain, Raza to go under hammer at Osian’s ABC auction first appeared on Indian Art News.

]]>
https://indianartnews.visionsarts.com/tagore-husain-raza-to-go-under-hammer-at-osians-abc-auction/feed/ 0 680